BBSRC Portfolio Analyser

Award details

Resistance: Understanding the impact of management agreements on reducing evolution of resistance in agriculture - sea lice management as an exemplar

ReferenceBB/R009309/1
Principal Investigator / Supervisor Dr Jessica Anne Enright
Co-Investigators /
Co-Supervisors		 Dr Anthony O'Hare, Dr Armin Sturm
Institution University of Edinburgh
DepartmentRoslin Institute
Funding typeResearch
Value (£) 311,385
StatusCompleted
TypeResearch Grant
Start date 18/07/2018
End date 31/08/2019
Duration13 months

Abstract

We will combine mathematical approaches with specialist parasite and industry knowledge to give an overall picture of the impact of joint management schemes on resistance risk in sea lice. Our first step will be a model of sea lice population growth incorporating population genetics and resistance evolution, implemented for running on a high-performance computing platform. Critically, our model of resistance will include several different possible modes of resistance action and inheritance, including multigenic resistance and maternal inheritance mechanisms. We will integrate this epidemiological/resistance model with a model of joint treatment decision-making, analysing the impact of management strategies on the evolution of resistance. Our decision-making model will include both a game-theoretic model in which every decision-maker is perfectly rational and an agent-based model with decision-making strategies designed to mimic real-life management. High performance computing will allow many iterations of this model, providing robust results and a clear sensitivity analysis. We will advance on previous work in several ways: including more complex resistance mechanisms will improve on current sea lice resistance models, which only allows simple single-gene resistance. The computational efficiency of the epidemiological model will allow runs over a larger scale than has been previously possible. Including both game-theoretic and agent-based decision modelling will allow more realistic modelling of treatment decision-making than in the past, along with comparison to a mathematically robust baseline. Combining these models will provide additional novelty and value. While our work will be achieved using models, our ultimate aim is to build an understanding of how joint decision-making can effect the evolution of resistance. That understanding will advance current knowledge about how cooperation in an epidemiological context can impact resistance.

Summary

Sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) are a parasite that affects the growth and performance of farmed and wild salmon, as well as decreasing their immune response, making them more susceptible to disease. Efforts to combat sea lice cost the salmon industry in Scotland an estimated £40M to control each year. Sea lice in the farmed salmon population in Scotland are managed cooperatively under agreements between managers within an area, though much of this collaboration is on a voluntary basis. Unfortunately, there are indications that sea lice are becoming resistant to current treatments, requiring managers to either increase the amount of treatment used, increase the frequency of treatment, or investigate alternative methods of integrated pest management. This bears significant extra cost and could have serious environmental consequences. In the context of this rising threat of resistance, management programs must be designed to slow the evolution of resistance, but strategic use of control agents can be complicated by the actions of other decision-makers, and by uncertainty about the levels of resistance present. Compared to terrestrial pests, little is known about how sea lice evolve resistance, but new information (under investigation by one of our team members (Dr. Sturm) under project BB/L022923/1) suggests that the mechanisms may be more complicated than expected, with at least one type of resistance transmitted only through the female line. Because of uncertainty about mechanisms of resistance, tests for resistance in sea lice are not universally reliable, and can be subject to failure if sampling of the lice is not done properly. Therefore, decision-makers managing sea lice face not only uncertainty about the actions of fellow producers, but also about the level of resistance currently present in the sea lice population. In this project, we will combine mathematical and game theoretic modelling methods with expert knowledge of sea lice and the salmonindustry to build a model of sea lice evolving resistance in a setting of multiple managers making decisions about how to treat sea lice. This combination of an epidemiological model of sea lice spread with a game theoretic model of treatment use will help us understand how management agreements between managers of fish farms can impact the risk of sea lice evolving resistance to treatments, and therefore help industry bodies better build and support these management agreements. Our project team has close links to industry bodies, and includes experts in the evolution of resistance in sea lice, in game-theoretic and epidemiological modelling, in high-performance computing, and in modelling of farmed fish. Using this expertise, our project will contribute to successful sea-lice management in Scotland, impacting not only the salmon industry, but also potentially wild salmon stocks, and therefore the wider marine environment.

Impact Summary

This project will have impact on a variety of scales over a broad range of beneficiaries. The primary non-academic beneficiaries of our project will be the salmon farming industry, e.g. Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation (SSPO), Marine Harvest, Scottish Sea Farms, Fish Vet Group, etc. Our proposed program of work will yield recommendations for the creation and management of farm management agreements, allowing improved efficiency of sea lice treatment and delaying the evolution of resistance. These recommendations will ultimately increase the profits of salmon farmers and minimise the infection stress to both farmed and wild fish. Bodies that govern the Scottish salmon industry will benefit from our work, including the Scottish government and industry bodies such as CEFAS. Our findings on the implications of differing farm management strategies within a management agreement and the importance of cooperation could be used to inform policy on how management agreements are built. Beyond the salmon industry, our work will have implications for understanding the dynamics of herd health agreements and local animal health cooperatives, such as exist in the cattle and sheep industries throughout Great Britain, and therefore we expect our work will indirectly benefit the terrestrial livestock health management community. When sea lice are well-controlled in farmed salmon, they will be less likely to affect the wild salmon population, so stakeholders in the health of the wild salmon population such as sport fishermen will also benefit from this work. One of the challenges facing the salmon farming industry is the public perception of the effect on wild salmon. Our work in controlling sea lice population will alleviate the negative perception and the growth of this industry will have a positive socio-economic impact on those communities close to where farms are sited, which are usually rural, isolated and often lack investment. As our work will support more efficient farmed salmon production, consumers of salmon will benefit from an efficient, and therefore potential lower-cost and higher-quality product. Because fish consumption supports health when it replaces red meat consumption our work has potential to contribute to a healthier populace overall, and increased food security.
Committee Research Committee A (Animal disease, health and welfare)
Research TopicsAnimal Health, Systems Biology
Research PriorityX – Research Priority information not available
Research Initiative X - not in an Initiative
Funding SchemeX – not Funded via a specific Funding Scheme
terms and conditions of use (opens in new window)
export PDF file
back to list new search