Award details

Functional housing systems for high welfare in laying hens: promoting natural behaviors in safe environments

Reference	BB/N00860X/1
Principal Investigator / Supervisor	Professor John Tarlton
Co-Investigators / Co-Supervisors	Dr Tristan Cogan, Professor Eric Morgan, Professor Christine Nicol
Institution	University of Bristol
Department	Clinical Veterinary Science
Funding type	Research
Value (£)	541,227
Status	Completed
Type	Research Grant
Start date	01/06/2016
End date	30/09/2020
Duration	52 months

Abstract

Keel bone fractures (KBF) and injurious feather pecking (IFP) are the major welfare and economic problems in free range laying hens, creating a very poor public perception of egg production and reducing profit for the industry. Studies show that up to 90% of hens suffer KBF in some free range systems (FRS), and most flocks have IFP affecting up to half of hens. Resolving these problems is urgent and timely, since the 2012 EU ban on battery cages increased use of FRS in the UK to over 20 million birds - equating around 14 million hens suffering bone breakage and 5 million suffering IFP each year. Proposed battery cage bans worldwide have raised this as a global issue. Also, a ban on beak trimming, the only effective control for IFP, in many EU countries, with a UK ban proposed, has further increased the urgency of this problem. Industry, legislators and welfare bodies are increasingly recognising many FRS as unsustainable. KBF is mostly due to impacts with housing structures during normal activity, and IFP is thought to originate as misdirected foraging behaviour combined with close hen proximity. There is evidence that greater time spent ranging away from the house reduces both KBF and IFP. This study hypothesises that increased activity away from housing structures and greater range use will reduce KBF by increasing bone strength whilst curbing hazardous collisions, and lessen IFP by promoting natural foraging behaviour discrete from other hens. The study will use a total of 12 free range, 12 enhanced free range and 12 barn systems to monitor flocks AND individual hens for activity in-house and on-range, and range use, by combining newly developed hen-mounted 3d-accelerometers and light-level monitors. We will relate these to keel KBF, IFP, pathogen load, overall health and skeletal function. This will provide evidence to inform production standards to help eradicate the two most serious welfare problems, to the benefit of hens, industry, retailers and consumers.

Summary

There are 36 million UK laying hens producing 10 billion eggs with a retail value of £1 billion. In the EU 335 million hens generate E10 billion, and globally there are nearly 5 billion hens producing over 1 trillion eggs. Egg production is a major wealth creator and a key element of global food production. In the EU, battery cage systems have been banned, with much of the production switched to free range systems (FRS). Similar legislation is proposed in many other countries, including India and the USA. FRS provide many health and welfare benefits to laying hens, however two major threats to welfare and production have recently emerged which require urgent action. Keel bone fractures effect on average 60% of hens in FRS, with some systems as high as 90%. These are painful and reduce productivity and profit. With up to 20 million UK hens suffering from keel fractures each year, the Farm Animal Welfare Committee regard this as the most serious problem of hen welfare. Injurious feather pecking (IFP) affects as many as half the hens in over three quarters of all FRS, resulting in pain, decreased egg production, increased feed consumption, and often leading to cannibalism and death. Beak trimming, the main means of controlling IFP, is now banned in a number of EU countries, with a UK ban proposed for 2016, leaving producers with no effective means of control. Urgent action is therefore needed to devise an alternative strategy to reduce levels of IFP. Welfare in laying hens remains a serious public concern, with over 75% of UK and EU citizens regarding hen welfare as inadequate. We have shown that impacts with structures within housing systems during normal activities are the major cause of keel fractures. However, hazardous housing structures cannot be entirely eliminated, and reducing activity, as seen in battery hens, seriously impairs skeletal function. We have shown that FRS hens making greater use of the range are more likely to remain fracture-free. However, range use in many systems remains very low, and the potential benefits of ranging are not being realised. We hypothesise that increased range use will promote activity away from hazardous structures, improving bone strength and skeletal function, but avoiding injurious impacts which generate keel damage. Similarly, we and others have indicated that ranging significantly reduces IFP, with an 89% drop in systems with substantial range use. Thus we hypothesise that action to increase range use will reduce incidence and severity of IFP, and encourage natural foraging behaviours. The aim is to determine whether actions to increase activity and natural behaviours in a safe environment will substantially and significantly reduce keel fractures and IFP in laying hens. However, ranging and activity may have other health and production consequences, and these will be examined at flock and individual level, allowing us to determine the effects of range use on the overall wellbeing of hens and the economic impact for the producers. This study will combine video monitoring, welfare assessments, cutting-edge activity logging developed in previous BBSRC funded research, and light-level monitoring technology provided by Biotrack, a leading animal monitoring specialist. We will compare normal FRS, enhanced FRS and barn systems to get a breadth of individual and flock activity, ranging and behaviours. For the first time, this will allow evaluation of range use and activity in flocks and individual hens in commercial production units, provided by Stonegate, our Industrial Partner, one of the UK's leading egg producers. By examining welfare outcomes of feather pecking behaviour, plumage scores and keel fractures, we can assess relationships with fracture incidence and IFP levels. We will further determine how activity relates to biomechanical, metabolic, physiological and radiological changes in bone, to better understand how exercise influences skeletal function in chickens.

Impact Summary

Who will benefit, and how? Laying Hens The principal beneficiaries of this study are free range laying hens. In a recent analysis of UK flocks, we calculated that less than 12% of birds will remain unharmed by end of lay, with the vast majority suffering from keel bone fractures (KBF), injurious feather pecking (IFP) or both. This corresponds to 15 million hens suffering keel bone breakage and 8 million affected by injurious feather pecking in the UK. If similar figures apply globally, this leaves a total of 4.3 billion hens exposed to potentially avoidable suffering. This project aims to substantially reduce KBF and IFP through a better understanding of how they relate to range use and site specific activities. This study has the potential to benefit billions of hens worldwide within a 5-10 year time scale. Egg producers The UK consumes 11.5 billion eggs per year, valued at £1billion. With widely reported welfare problems, producers are acutely aware of their poor public image. Bone breakage and injurious feather pecking also result in wastage and reduced productivity, imposing an enormous financial burden. The egg industry will benefit from improved productivity, reduced wastage and the possibility of marketing eggs as "welfare friendly", enhancing profitability and public image. In the short term Stonegate expect to increase their market share by rapidly responding to our findings and marketing eggs produced by high-welfare hens, backed up by good scientific evidence. The proposed UK ban on beak trimming is strongly opposed by farmers groups such as the NFU, as there are no comparable measure to reduce IFP currently available. This study aims to provide such an alternative. Retailers Retailers have expressed support for this study (see attached). Extensive surveys suggest that welfare problems in egg production have considerably hampered egg retail, and therefore enhanced welfare would be expected to generate an increased volume of sales throughout the sector. UK PLC UK egg annual trade deficit is approximately £120 million. If the UK become market leaders in sustainable and high welfare egg production, this will benefit industry and the UK economy. EU wide surveys suggest UK industry would gain increased market share across Europe for "welfare friendly" eggs. Consumers and society In EU wide surveys of the egg market, over half of respondents believed that laying hen welfare is bad or very bad, consider welfare important in their purchasing choices, and would pay extra for high welfare eggs. In our own recent survey of 1776 consumers, over 75% were concerned with hen welfare and would spend more on high welfare eggs. Clearly, welfare in egg production is a major concern, and clear improvements would benefit consumers and society. Policy makers and welfare bodies Strong evidence of improved health and welfare in laying hens would allow welfare bodies (such as the RSPCA and the BHWT), policy makers (such as FAWC, DEFRA and the Beak Trimming Action Group), industry bodies (such as BEA, BEIC, IEC, BFREPA, BEPA, NEMAL and the Soil Association) and assurance schemes (such as Freedom Foods and AssureWel), to make clear recommendations to government, industry and consumers on sustainable and ethical egg production based on sound scientific evidence. Our work on battery cages, feather pecking, transport, welfare at slaughter, and keel fractures have previously led to a number of legislative changes, changes in welfare standards, setting up of governmental enquiries, and other initiatives. As a result of this study, we would expect welfare standards to be modified within a 5 year time scale. Researchers Training of technical and postdoctoral researchers will provide a skill resource translating into a number of research areas. Training is a key part of this study, and researchers have access to a wealth of expertise within the research team, and a unique opportunity to work with industry.

Committee	Research Committee A (Animal disease, health and welfare)
Research Topics	Animal Health, Animal Welfare, Neuroscience and Behaviour
Research Priority	X – Research Priority information not available
Research Initiative	X - not in an Initiative
Funding Scheme	X – not Funded via a specific Funding Scheme

I accept the terms and conditions of use (opens in new window)

export PDF file

back to list new search