Award details

The evolutionary genomics of X chromosomes

Reference	BB/G003076/1
Principal Investigator / Supervisor	Professor Brian Charlesworth
Co-Investigators / Co-Supervisors	Dr Andrea Betancourt
Institution	University of Edinburgh
Department	Inst of Evolutionary Biology
Funding type	Research
Value (£)	337,707
Status	Completed
Type	Research Grant
Start date	05/12/2008
End date	04/03/2012
Duration	39 months

Abstract

This proposal concerns three projects designed to study aspects of X chromosome population genetics. Two of the projects concern faster-X evolution i.e. the idea that, under certain conditions, X-linked loci should show higher rates of adaptive evolution. Although these projects focus on X chromosome evolution, they allow inferences to be made about the nature of all beneficial mutations, as faster-X only occurs when the average beneficial mutation is (i) new and (ii) recessive. For the first study, which concerns faster-X evolution in Drosophila, we will take advantage of an X-autosome translocation in the D. pseudoobscura clade that allows comparison of rates of protein evolution between homologous genes evolving in X-linked or autosomal contexts. To this end, we will use data from the D. melanogaster, D. yakuba and D. pseudoobscura genomes, collect polymorphism data from 15 lines of D. pseudoobscura, and generate new sequences from D. affinis. We plan to extend previous studies of this nature by (i) comparing rates over a longer evolutionary distance and (ii) performing a polymorphism analysis to estimate the proportion of amino acid changes fixed by selection. The second study asks whether there is a stronger faster-X in duplicate genes, using genome data from mouse and rat to compare Ka/Ks in duplicate vs. single copy genes. A stronger signal of faster-X in duplicate genes might be expected for several reasons, including the possibility that beneficial mutations in duplicates may be more recessive. The third study concerns intron length evolution in Drosophila. Intriguingly, introns are slightly longer on the X-chromosome. In this project, we will explore large polymorphism data sets for a signal of stabilizing selection on intron length, and for X-autosome differences in this signal.

Summary

The sex of an individual is often determined by a pair of specialized chromosomes (the giant DNA molecules that carry the genetic information). These are known as the X and Y chromosomes. In animals like mammals and the fruitfly Drosophila, females carry two copies of the X, and males carry an X and a Y. Both males and females carry two copies of each of the other chromosomes, one derived from the mother and the other from the father. The X is a fairly typical chromosome but the Y has only a small number of functional genes (the portions of the DNA that specify the structures of proteins). This means that most new mutations that occur on the X and alter gene function will affect males, since there is no normal copy to cover up their effects. In contrast, a mutation on the X in a female will be present together with a normal copy, just like a mutation on another chromosome. Natural selection is better at removing harmful mutations if they arise on the X, since part of the time they are carried in males and fully express their effects. Similarly, useful mutations that increase the fitness of their carriers may have a better chance of causing evolutionary change if they arise on the X. These differences in rates of evolution between the X and the rest of the genome can have important consequences, such as a greater tendency for genes controlling species differences to be found on the X chromosome. The ability to determine the sequences of the four 'letters' in DNA that make up the genetic information means that we can directly measure rates of evolutionary change by comparing DNA sequences between species. Such comparisons have been used to ask whether rates of evolution differ between genes on the X chromosome and elsewhere in the genome. The results so far have been conflicting. We plan to use two unusually favourable systems for further comparisons of this kind, which should help to resolve these conflicts. One is a group of Drosophila species (the pseudoobscura lineage), where a regular chromosome has effectively been turned into an additional X chromosome. This allows us to compare rates of evolution of genes on this chromosome with rates for the same genes on the equivalent chromosome in other Drosophila species, where it behaves normally. We will target unusually fast-evolving genes, since these are most likely to be the ones accumulating useful mutations by natural selection. We will also collect data on variation on these genes within one of the species, Drosophila pseudoobscura. This allows the use of statistical tests for evolution by selection for useful mutations, as opposed to the chance accumulation of mutations with little effect on fitness. The other system is in the mouse, which has new (duplicate) copies of many genes, some on the X and some on regular chromosomes. This allows comparisons of the rates of evolutionary divergences among pairs of duplicates between the X chromosome and the rest of the genome. We will use the publicly available genome sequences of the mouse and its relative the rat, and ask whether duplicates on the X have higher rates of DNA sequence evolution than those elsewhere. In addition, we will study a different type of process, the addition and deletion of small pieces of DNA. This process is important for the evolution of genome size, but is poorly understood. It seems to have different properties for the X compared with the rest of the genome, with the X showing a stronger pattern of insertions being favoured by natural selection over deletions. We will use publicly available data on between species comparisons and within species variability to examine the nature of the evolutionary forces acting on additions and deletions. The research integrates evolutionary genetic and computational approaches to maximize the understanding gained from genome sequences, and will provide new tools and insights concerning evolutionary mechanisms to the research community in the UK.

Committee	Closed Committee - Genes & Developmental Biology (GDB)
Research Topics	X – not assigned to a current Research Topic
Research Priority	X – Research Priority information not available
Research Initiative	X - not in an Initiative
Funding Scheme	X – not Funded via a specific Funding Scheme

I accept the terms and conditions of use (opens in new window)

export PDF file

back to list new search